The Sources of Normativity has ratings and 12 reviews. Anthony said: Somewhere in the middle of this book you get the feeling that you may, in fact. Christine M. Korsgaard, The Sources of Normativity (Cambridge: Cambridge reflection leads ineluctably to her endorsement of the source of moral claims. The Sources of Normativity Christine M. Korsgaard, with G. A. Cohen, Raymond Geuss, Thomas Nagel, and Bernard Williams Onora O’Neill, Editor Cambridge.
|Published (Last):||13 August 2004|
|PDF File Size:||14.4 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||19.32 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Brian rated it liked it Apr 25, And that helpful feature means that certain important korsgaarc are made available to the reader at once, together with Korsgaard’s responses thereto.
Her theory is not only trenchantly presented but developed through an enlightening discussion of the history of ethical theory. But where does their authority over us come from? Korsgaard makes one too many logical leaps, in the traditional ca Korsgaard is attempting to develop a neo-kantian ethic. But let’s start at the beginning and watch the failure unfold.
Korsgaard makes one too many logical leaps, in the traditional callous Kantian sense, of thinking just because someone does reason X, they will and must do X. Cambridge University PressJun 28, – Philosophy – pages. Your reasons express your identity, your nature; your obligations spring from what that identity forbids. To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.
Account Options Sign in. korsgaarc
Read more Read less. Set up a giveaway. Chris rated it really liked it Mar 28, Or at least when we invoke them, we make claims on one another; but where does their authority over us – or ours cheistine one another – come from?
Michael Zhao – forthcoming – Philosophical Studies: Amazon Rapids Fun stories for kids on the go. How is it that we become morally obliged? First of all, Korsgaard wants to ask “the normative question,” that zources, what justifies the claims morality makes on us.
Science Logic and Mathematics. The Sources of Normativity.
Ketib Oldiais rated it korsaard liked it Sep 04, One of the challenges with the book, and it does weigh a bit on my review of the book, is that the language is often more obscure and technical than it needs to be, and dwells on a lot of references within the lit Korsgaard is a legend in modern ethics and meta-ethics, and this book is a pretty good illustration of why that sourcces.
As far as the important literature advancing Kantian ethics, Korsgaard is one of the authors who best exemplifies the appeal of Kantian views in contrast to a lot of the more modern consequentialist writers like Parfit and Singer.
Christine Korsgaard identifies four accounts of the source of normativity that have been advocated by modern moral philosophers: My library Help Advanced Book Search. English Choose a chrisfine for shopping.
Christine Korsgaard, The Sources of Normativity – PhilPapers
The arguments are succinct, poignant, and thoughtful; she considers a pretty wide range of possible views advanced throughout the 19th and 20th century ethics literature. Recommended to Anthony sourfes To ask other readers questions about The Sources of Normativityplease sign up. If you’re not, move along. There are no discussion topics on this book yet.
Thanks for telling us about the problem. Her view is at heart a modification of Kant, and she is careful to explain both what her approach shares with Kant’s and exactly what her departure consists of.
The Sources of Normativity
History morality and thetestof reflection. East Dane Designer Men’s Fashion. No trivia or quizzes yet. Would you like to tell us about a lower price? Korsgaard makes one too many logical leaps, in the traditional callous Kantian sense, of thinking just because someone does reason X, they will and must do X.
This is a categorically different claim then the standard normative claim of one ought to do X, and it is one that is demonstrable false. What We Owe to Each Other.
Desmond, Choice “This is a book anyone working in ethics should have on the desk. JL Vanderhoek rated it really liked it Aug 25,